Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Spouting Thomas's avatar

I’ve heard it said that no kids zones are largely driven by liability. Apparently courts there are inclined to hand out excessive penalties when a child is injured at a business.

In which case, it’s yet another example of policy having unforeseen consequences. An effort to protect kids leads to families having fewer options and fewer kids being born.

But if 60%+ of the population supports them, maybe the noise of kids is part of it too. Or maybe liability got the ball rolling, but now it has taken on a life of its own where people seek these establishments out.

Expand full comment
Alex Kotenko's avatar

South Korea seems to be a culture that chose suicide.

They may not understand this right now, but the quoted 68% support for having no-kid zones means they decided to commit a nationwide prolonged suicide. This may be extended in time, and they will probably enjoy this time while it lasts, but at some point they will understand that they just will vanish off the face of the planet, and it will be too late to do anything. It is probably already too late.

Whoever wants to visit South Korea while it still exists - do it now.

Expand full comment

No posts